Massimo is exposing the problems inherent in this intuitive, unreflective view of what is "natural". A Brief Overview of MAP Founded in , the Movement Advancement Project is an independent think tank that provides rigorous research, insight and analysis that help speed equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender LGBT people. This is a rhetorical question. A case in point, I can see a number of objections to your arguments. Pleasure that causes no harm is unequivocally a good thing to me. Do you have empirical and philosophical arguments at the ready here? If not, then I would not.
Kentucky judge recuses himself from all adoption cases involving same-sex partners
Furthermore, a priori considerations don't have a monopoly over intentional and circumstantial considerations. Paolini January 16, 9: I want to know what the ideal state of well-being is, and how that's determined. The anxieties about the potentially negative effects for children of being placed with gay fathers seem to be, from our study, unfounded. There may be some weak correlation there but I think not as much as you assume. Hi Michael, Good point.
Gay-rights group launches campaign to stop adoption bill | Fox News
Disagreeable Me January 22, 3: It's so clearly the right answer there's not much to say about it. Ok, so he did it in the comments section rather than the OP. Its substantiate luck was to acquire kids that "gay relationship" was a great popular rights victory. Lawyers say Nance is deeply religious and opposed to divorce. It does not actually mount much of a defense against NiqDan's arguments against sodomy in general.
ND, if one actually utilized your definition of marriage, then most same-sex couple wouldn't be "married. Thirdly, you can only "make men essential" if you're a legal positivist, which I'm not. Marriage amongst the hetero-population is so degraded from your ideal as to be unrecognizable. I didn't see it being covered. Hi Daniel, I would also be skeptical of NiqDan's Aristotelian premises, but it seems to me that the conclusion that gay sex is unintelligible doesn't follow even if we grant those premises. He is sexually harrassing customers, causing harm that an LGBT restaurateur would not.